Articles

HBO Max Can't Decide Who It Is...

When the name changes more than the content, somethings off. Heres why HBO Maxs branding chaos matters...

What Even Is HBO Max Anymore?

HBO Max, or Max, or HBO, or whatever they feel like this quarter, has changed names and looks so often, we wouldn’t be shocked if next year it rebrands as "Just Watch Something Please."

This isn’t just a messy facelift. It’s an identity crisis—one that’s shredding brand recognition, alienating users, and ironically proving HBO’s world-class storytelling doesn’t extend to its own branding.

Five Rebrands in Three Years?

Let’s review the timeline of brand whiplash:

  • 2022: HBO Max in blue-purple gradients (remember those?)

  • 2023: Just “Max” in deeper purples

  • 2024: New typeface, same “Max,” now in electric-dark blues

  • 2025: Still “Max,” now in flat black (edgy!)

  • Also 2025: Surprise! Back to HBO Max, but now in silver and black with yet another typeface

Why? Officially, it’s about finding a look that represents them better. Unofficially, whispers suggest botched promo deals and messy backend logistics. Either way, the brand’s visual identity is being treated like a mood board on shuffle.



Recognition vs. Reinvention

The problem isn’t just aesthetic. Most of these rebrands weren’t terrible. The 2022 HBO Max had a decent color scheme. The 2024 version? Actually more unified. But none of that matters when each identity lasts about as long as a trending TikTok sound.

Branding 101: consistency builds recognition. That’s what makes your brand stick, even when the viewer’s a grumpy grandpa who only remembers "the purple HBO thing." When you yank that away repeatedly, what you get isn’t freshness—it’s friction. Confusion. Disengagement. Not exactly great for a product that lives and dies by monthly subscribers.

Meanwhile, on social media, HBO Max (or Max, or whatever) leans into irony. Memes, jokes, self-deprecating quips. But if your brand is on fire, maybe don’t make jokes while everything burns. Irony doesn’t fix identity disorder.


The Netflix and Disney Blueprint

In a landscape where every week brings a new platform to subscribe to, brand stability is everything. HBO may still be a prestige powerhouse, but this rebrand-a-thon is testing the audience's patience—and their memory.

Let’s compare: Netflix has changed its logo four times—in 28 years. It has never strayed from the red-black palette or its name. Why? Because that red means something now. It’s built emotional equity, binge-watching nostalgia, and algorithmic trust. Even when the content fluctuates, the brand feels stable.

Disney is even more masterful. When it merged with Star+, they didn’t invent a new hybrid brand. They just folded the content into Disney+, preserving the iconic mouse-ear halo and similar colors. The brand didn’t skip a beat. That's legacy-level branding—when your identity is so strong, it absorbs others without losing its shape.

So don’t tell us it has to be this way. The streaming giants are proving that you can evolve without confusing the hell out of your audience. HBO Max is just... not listening.


Just Stick to Something

These changes feel less like strategy and more like someone at Warner Bros. has a secret bet running on Polymarket: "Will HBO Max rebrand again before Q4?"

The lack of long-term thinking is obvious. Visual identity is supposed to build equity over time. But HBO Max keeps burning its own assets for a few seconds of novelty. We’re not impressed. We're exhausted.

Good branding isn’t just pretty; it’s memorable. And HBO Max’s revolving-door identity is making sure no one remembers a damn thing.

In a saturated, cutthroat streaming market, the last thing you want is to make your audience work to find you. So here’s some unsolicited advice: Commit to one identity. Build on it. Stop reinventing the wheel every fiscal quarter. Your subscribers will thank you.


P.S. Our opinion in terms of aesthetics:

1st Apple TV+

2nd Netflix

3th Disney+

Other articles