Articles

Why Graza’s Website Is a Masterclass in Good Website Design and UX

Jan 27th 2026

Why does Grazas website work so well when so many others dont? We unpack the design and UX choices behind it and what they can teach any brand building online.

Graza homepage hero section showing brand name and statement about always fresh, never blended extra virgin olive oil.
Graza homepage hero section showing brand name and statement about always fresh, never blended extra virgin olive oil.

Everyone says they want a “good website.” What they usually mean is something that looks nice: strong colors, cool typography, maybe a bit of motion. And sure — visuals matter. But we’ve all seen beautiful websites that feel confusing, slow, or strangely hard to buy from.

A good website is something else entirely. It’s a system. One where visual design, structure, and UX decisions work together so smoothly that the experience feels obvious. Natural. Almost invisible.

Graza’s website is a great example of this. On paper, it’s a simple product: olive oil. Two main SKUs. No complex tech, no massive catalog. And yet, the site consistently manages to educate, convince, upsell, and retain — without ever feeling pushy or exhausting.

That’s not an accident. It’s design and UX doing the work together.


What a “good website” really is (and why visuals alone aren’t enough)

A good website isn’t defined by taste alone. It’s defined by how well it helps users move forward.

At its core, good website design and UX comes down to a few things:

  • Clarity: users immediately understand what’s being sold and why it matters

  • Hierarchy: the site tells you what to look at first, second, and third

  • Momentum: each interaction makes the next step feel easier, not heavier

  • Reduced friction: fewer decisions, fewer doubts, fewer dead ends

Visual design plays a huge role here — but not as decoration. Color, typography, illustration, and motion are doing structural work. They highlight differences, guide attention, and create emotional cues that support the UX logic underneath.


Graza Trio product page showing Sizzle, Drizzle, and Frizzle olive oil bottles with pricing, quantity options, and subscription purchase details.


Graza’s site gets this balance right. The brand is loud, playful, and opinionated, but the experience itself is surprisingly calm. You’re never wondering what to do next. You’re never overwhelmed with options. The visuals pull you in, and the UX quietly keeps you moving.

This becomes clear the moment you land on the site.


First impressions that already steer behavior

Most pop-ups fail for the same reason: they ask too much, too fast.

They interrupt without context, push discounts with no framing, and force users into a binary choice — give us your email or get out of the way. Even when the visual design is decent, the UX logic is usually clumsy.

Graza’s first interaction works because it does the opposite.

Instead of leading with a form, the site opens with a question: what do you actually use olive oil for? Frying and baking. Cooking and roasting. Dressing and dipping. Or all of the above.


Graza discount modal asking how olive oil is used, shown beside boxed gift sets and bottled olive oil products.


From a UX perspective, this is a smart piece of progressive engagement. You’re not being asked to commit yet — you’re being asked to recognize yourself. The interaction lowers friction by turning a conversion moment into a classification moment.

Visually, the design reinforces that softness. The pop-up is generous in scale, calm in color, and clearly part of the brand world. Nothing flashes. Nothing feels urgent. Even the buttons feel more like choices than CTAs.

There’s also an important psychological shift happening here. By the time the email field appears, you’ve already invested a small action. You’ve told the site how you cook. The discount now feels contextual, almost earned — not like a bribe.

This is a subtle but powerful UX move. The pop-up doesn’t block the experience; it starts it. And because it aligns visual tone with behavioral logic, it feels intentional instead of intrusive.

That’s why it works.


Bundles, subscriptions, and the art of spending more than planned

Most people don’t land on Graza’s website planning to build a long-term olive oil strategy. They’re curious. They want to try something new. Maybe they’re thinking of spending twenty bucks.

And yet, many of them end up spending much more.

That’s not because the site is manipulative. It’s because the UX is designed to expand intent gradually, not all at once.

Bundling is the first lever. Instead of presenting single products as the obvious default, Graza frames bundles as the most sensible starting point. Visually, these bundles feel complete and purposeful — not like a pile of add-ons, but like a smart decision someone already made for you.

Two Graza website screens showing bundled olive oil products and refill sets arranged in a grid layout on a shop page.

From a UX standpoint, this reduces decision fatigue. You don’t have to wonder whether you’re missing something. The bundle answers that question upfront.

Subscriptions layer on top of this logic. They’re introduced early, but softly. Not as a hard sell, not as a pop-up trap — just as a natural extension of the product’s role in your kitchen. The framing is about convenience and continuity, not savings hacks or lock-in.

Then comes the checkout.

This is where many brands ruin the experience with aggressive upsells. Graza does the opposite. The upselling at checkout is restrained, relevant, and visually consistent with the rest of the site. Suggestions feel adjacent to what you’ve already chosen, not like a sudden attempt to squeeze more value out of you.

From a UX perspective, this works because:

  • Upsells are contextual, not random

  • They appear after commitment, not before clarity

  • The visual language stays calm and familiar

Four Graza cart screens showing add-on upsell offers like sprays, refill cans, bottles, and snacks before checkout.

Psychologically, the user has already crossed the biggest threshold: deciding to buy. At this point, adding something extra feels incremental, not risky. The site respects that moment instead of overwhelming it.

The cumulative effect is subtle but powerful. Each step widens the basket just a little — bundle instead of single, subscription instead of one-off, relevant add-on instead of noise.

By the time you reach the final total, it doesn’t feel like you were pushed. It feels like you simply built the right setup for yourself.


Turning olive oil into a brand ecosystem

Zoom out from individual pages, and something else becomes clear.

Graza isn’t just selling olive oil. It’s building a system.

What’s interesting is that this ecosystem isn’t driven by flashy campaigns or constant novelty. It’s embedded directly into the website experience itself — through how products relate to each other, how reordering is encouraged, and how the site reinforces habitual use.

From a UX perspective, the ecosystem shows up in repetition and reinforcement. The same logic appears across product pages, bundles, subscriptions, and checkout. You’re consistently reminded that this isn’t a one-off purchase — it’s something that belongs in your kitchen, used daily, replaced automatically.


Three Graza olive oil bottles displayed on a product selection page with pricing and labels for finishing, cooking, and high heat oil.


Visually, that consistency matters. The tone, layout, and interactions never reset or surprise you in the wrong way. The brand personality stays present, but it never competes with usability or clarity.

This is where many brands go wrong. They try to build “brand worlds” through add-ons that sit outside the core journey. Graza does it inside the journey. The ecosystem is the flow itself.

The payoff is loyalty that feels practical rather than performative. You’re not coming back because you’re entertained — you’re coming back because the experience makes staying easy.


Why this works — and what to take from it

When you strip away the colors, illustrations, and jokes, Graza’s website is built on very solid fundamentals.

A few principles show up again and again:

  • Visual hierarchy that makes decisions feel simple

  • Progressive disclosure that teaches without overwhelming

  • Choice architecture that nudges without forcing

  • Reduced decision fatigue through focused options

None of this is flashy. And that’s the point.

The biggest mistake brands make when looking at sites like this is trying to copy the surface. The real lesson isn’t the aesthetic — it’s the thinking behind it.

A good website doesn’t shout. It doesn’t rely on tricks. It quietly aligns design and UX so that the right choice feels like the obvious one.

If you’re evaluating your own site, this is a useful gut check: are your visuals and your UX working toward the same goal, or are they fighting for attention?

When those two finally align, conversion stops feeling like a battle. And that’s usually the moment a website starts doing its real job.

© 2025 Attlas Design. All rights reserved. All text, images, and graphics on this site are the intellectual property of Attlas Design and may not be reproduced, distributed, or translated without prior written consent.

© 2025 Attlas Design. All rights reserved. All text, images, and graphics on this site are the intellectual property of Attlas Design and may not be reproduced, distributed, or translated without prior written consent.

 Assorted illustrated sardine tins in various colors arranged on a tabletop, showing diverse food packaging styles.

Jan 29th 2026

The Strategic Role of Packaging as a Brand Touchpoint

Branding

Packaging does more than protect a product — it sets expectations before anything else happens. Here’s why treating packaging as a strategic brand touchpoint can change how your brand is perceived.

 Assorted illustrated sardine tins in various colors arranged on a tabletop, showing diverse food packaging styles.

Jan 29th 2026

The Strategic Role of Packaging as a Brand Touchpoint

Branding

Packaging does more than protect a product — it sets expectations before anything else happens. Here’s why treating packaging as a strategic brand touchpoint can change how your brand is perceived.

A set of simplified fast-food icons using the same colors, shapes, and visual style across different food items.

Jan 26th 2026

Visual Brand Consistency: Why It Matters More Than You Think

Branding

Your brand might look fine — but still feel wrong. Visual consistency is often the missing piece between good design and brands people actually trust.

A set of simplified fast-food icons using the same colors, shapes, and visual style across different food items.

Jan 26th 2026

Visual Brand Consistency: Why It Matters More Than You Think

Branding

Your brand might look fine — but still feel wrong. Visual consistency is often the missing piece between good design and brands people actually trust.

Keith Haring stands in front of a mural of dancing figures with his name written across the image.

Jan 23th 2026

Keith Haring and the Power of Visual Language

Education

Keith Haring’s work feels immediate and playful, but nothing about it is accidental. His design style was built as a clear visual language, made to travel across walls, posters, and products without losing meaning.

Keith Haring stands in front of a mural of dancing figures with his name written across the image.

Jan 23th 2026

Keith Haring and the Power of Visual Language

Education

Keith Haring’s work feels immediate and playful, but nothing about it is accidental. His design style was built as a clear visual language, made to travel across walls, posters, and products without losing meaning.

Grid of brand logos showing multiple companies with updated identities dated 2020 and 2025 for comparison.

Jan 22nd 2026

Everyone Rebranded in 2025. Not Everyone Should Have.

Opinion

After a year flooded with rebrands, a few stood out for the right reasons. Many didn’t. Here are the best and worst rebrands of 2025.

Grid of brand logos showing multiple companies with updated identities dated 2020 and 2025 for comparison.

Jan 22nd 2026

Everyone Rebranded in 2025. Not Everyone Should Have.

Opinion

After a year flooded with rebrands, a few stood out for the right reasons. Many didn’t. Here are the best and worst rebrands of 2025.